EVIDENCE

Evidence you can cite

Peer-reviewed validation plus real-world deployment outcomes, presented in a format your team can share internally.
Clinical Validation
Clinicom has a published validation study examining concordance and reproducibility compared to commonly used clinical instruments.
Key takeaways

78%

Test-retest concordance at the individual disorder level

PHQ-9 and HAM-A

Concordance evaluated against instruments including PHQ-9 and HAM-A (plus other domain measures referenced in the study)
Published
Published in Psychiatry Research (2018), DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.029
This study evaluates concordance and reproducibility. It does not replace clinician judgment.

Clinicom’s assessment logic is built from clinical research experience, instrument development, and continuous refinement through real-world clinical use.

Greenbrook TMS
Standardized intake and enabled session-by-session monitoring across a TMS workflow.
Katy Counseling
Standardized assessments across clinicians and supported outcomes tracking for diverse populations.
What Clinicians Are Saying
“Pre-visit intake increases disclosure and context.”
— Clinical Program Director
"Structured, consistent data from the first interaction helps clinical decision making."
— Psychiatrist, Private Practice
Aggregate outcomes from deployed sites show consistent completion and strong clinician usability.
94%

Assessment completion rate

89%

Patient engagement with pre-visit assessments

96%
Clinician satisfaction
No-show reduction observed when Clinicom is part of the care cadence

Note: Results vary by setting, implementation approach, and population. Metrics shown reflect aggregate deployment data.

Request the evidence pack

Get the validation study, outcomes summary, and implementation notes in one shareable packet.

Schedule a demo to review fit for your workflow and population.